I have to say that Endgame (and related films, 'Police State' etc.) was probably one of the first movies (along with Loose Change) that really 'woke me up' and gave me at least a rough outline of part of the system we're dealing with. There really isn't anything in it I take major issue with, if I remember correctly (saw it right after it came out and haven't seen it again in 5+ years), aside from its dark tone, total lack of solutions, and association with Alex Jones. The vast majority of information in it is true as far as I recall.
I dont recall to have watched any of the PrisonPlanet documentaries you mentioned, but I feel you. It was the movie "Zeitgeist" that 'woke me up' and gave me at least a rough outline of part of the system we're dealing with. But it didnt take too long to realize the hidden underlying agenda of Zeitgeist, especially after Zeitgeist and Peter Joseph connected itself to and promoted the Venus Project (and its Communist & New Age theme).
I don't see what you were referring to in the 2013 (that is James Tracy's blog not Corbett).
Sorry, I forgot to post the proper link to that quote, it was a Tweet by the CorbettReport:
So Corbett tweeted a blogpost by the memoryholeblog where James Tracy is defending Alex Jones. Which basically means that Corbett is defending Jones in Nov 2013 (little less than 3 years ago).
Here in the comments a certain "Bort" is suggesting the following: "James Corbett said that he got into a lot of stuff from trying to disprove what he heard on AJ's show."
So one possibility could be that because of this Corbett held AJ in high values and had him on a lot in the beginning of his show. Later on Corbett would get disillusioned with AJ and quit the support.
But a second possibility, and I think it's the more plausible one, could be that the CorbettReport was set up specifically in the PrisonPlanet environment in order to engross the part of AJ's audience that is leaving him because of his behaviour.
You can visualize that when you think of the truth as an onion. The truth is at the core and each layer of the onion is covering the core [truth], each layer of the onion is a layer of disinformation, while the most outer layer of the onion (the brown one) is the narrative of the mainstream media.
If we apply this allegory to 9/11, then the outer layer of the onion is that "BinLadinDidIt because he hates our freedoms." When you pull that layer away you are at the LIHOP theory. The government new about the attacks but let them happen anyway because they wanted to use them to their advantage. If you pull that layer away, you arrive maybe at the LooseChange point of view, where "BushDidIt to start another phony war for the military industrial complex." If you pull that layer away, ... blahblah .. you get the idea. There are nanothermite, DEW, mini nukes, noplanes and so on.
So Corbett could very well be a more inner layer in terms of general disinformation than AJ, deliberately installed there by the perps to suck in the folks who are leaving AJ because of his antics and are looking for a more "credible" way to aquire information.
What is Corbetts opinion on 9/11 noplane? Does he have any? If yes, what is it?
Promoting Bitcoin is not the same as promoting government-mandated cashlessness.
Actually it is, if you take into consideration that the CFR created it for that very purpose.
On Jesse Ventura, I'm actually fairly well-versed in the WWF and I don't see anything sinister at all about the kind of acting that goes on there
Yeah, surely nothing sinister going on over there, they just happen to have their own New World Order wrestling team, but this must be merely a coincidence.
Ventura was a 'frogman' in the Navy, in essentially a predecessor unit to the Navy SEALs (the most elite Navy unit).
So it could very well be that he was recruited by Intelligence/the Masons while he was in the military to become some sort of future media persona. Wouldn't certainly have been the first time. (see Laurel Canyon; Jim Morrisons father was military intelligence; etc.)
In my opinion Ventura is a con-man like AJ who is making money off it.
I believe Peekay, Nathan Stolpman and all the rest are in fact shills with bad intentions.
Whats your opinion of ChangingReason?
But just look at the people in school plays, drama club. These are future actors. I came across a ton of acting majors in New York. They're by and large not bad people.
Woah, woah, woah ... I never suggested that "all actors are in on it and bad people". Far from it. All I wanted to say is that in order to lie effectivly to people and take them on a ride as a con-man you have to have acting skills.
A politician needs acting skills much more than any other skill. With acting skills you can pretty easily become a psychiatrist, but not a technical engineer. I hope you get the idea.
Saying "all actors are bad people and in on it" is exactly the same as saying "all Jews are bad people and in on it". It's just plain stupid.