Tags : :
I'd like to clear up my stance on Zionism and whether or not we are dealing with a 'Jewish' conspiracy since I felt I shortchanged the idea a little in the recent conversation with TPS. I have Jewish friends and know a lot of Jewish people (there are many more Jewish people in my area than in other parts of the country), and I really don't like insinuations that it's a 'Jewish' conspiracy, any more than I like insinuations that it's a Christian conspiracy when white non-Jews who were born Christian make up the majority of the power structure, so I was careful linking Jews in general to what was being discussed. TPS didn't suggest it was and made it clear that it's a small minority involved in any conspiracy and not Jewish people at large.
Huge portions of the power structure, mainly the 'Anglo-American' and European interests described by Carroll Quigley, are not controlled by Jewish interests. If you look at the Bilderberg attendee list for example, the majority are white Christian non-Jews. If you look at Bohemian Grove, it's the same. In both groups, Jews are a minority. If you look at the CIA, FBI, NSA, and intelligence world, there have historically been few Jews, and it's been made up almost entirely of 'WASPs,' more broadly people of English /Dutch /German/ Scandinavian descent, and I'd guess there are few Jews in it today. The Upper East Side Manhattan elite until recently barred Jews from living in their co-ops, and some unofficially still do. There's really no evidence that the Rockefellers, Morgans, Carnegies, Vanderbilts, etc, were Jewish (as alleged by some) or ruled by the Rothschilds, and they all appear to be Christian. A large majority of the powerful American families of the 18th 19th and 20th centuries, the old money in the US, Robber Barons, etc, over the history of the country have not been Jewish. Very little of European royalty and old money have been Jewish.
Looking at the power structure today, the oil and natural resource interests and defense industry interests who have benefited from war in the Middle East (and received most of the related contract spending) and directed foreign policy elsewhere are generally not Jewish, as far as I know. Freemasons and politicians/Presidents (all the interrelated families, etc) associated with them are said to play a role in the power structure, the design of the US capital and federal buildings, etc., (a subject I haven't looked into that much), and they overwhelmingly aren't Jewish either. Many major banks are owned or run by Jews, but I strongly doubt that most are. If you look at the political and financial interests behind the Federal Reserve, none of the politicians and only 1 of 6 of the Jekyll Island conspirators behind it were Jewish, albeit the one being a Rothschild representative. The early Rhodes Round Table and globalist groups were not mostly Jewish. In the media and Hollywood, Jews, many of whom have a radical social and political agenda, do clearly dominate. However there's a lot of nuance even in this field. The majority of Jewish actors, writers, producers, directors, and media executives are surely not 'in on it,' so it isn't so simple as pointing to any Jew in the media world and saying 'Aha! Another radical Zionist/Illuminist!' This should go without saying, but it has to be said based on the logic I've seen in many articles and videos out there. Every Jewish person that TPS has mentioned both in the media and government (mostly related to Israeli dual citizens who were involved in the 9/11 cover-up) has in fact been 100% part of the power structure.
The last four Federal Reserve chairmen have been Jewish, and it's arguably the single most powerful position in the world. 4 out of the last 4 and at least 6 out of 14 chairmen have been Jewish. It could be as many as 10, but I can't find any definitive sources on Harding, Crissinger, Young, or Black. This, especially the recent streak, combined with significant representation in the news media and Hollywood is probably the most convincing argument for rule in large part by Jewish forces, the media and banking sectors being the 'commanding heights' of the society and economy in my opinion (but as noted below, the largely non-Jewish intel/defense worlds and natural resource sector also holds significant power). On the other hand, the Bank of England, Bank of Japan, Bundesbank, European Central Bank, and Bank for International Settlements are all run by non-Jews and member banks mostly owned by non-Jews. It's also important to note that the majority of the biggest US banks are not Jewish-owned or managed, and those banks own the Fed (the Fed is owned by the Federal Reserve System member banks). That could bolster theories that Jews are not in charge of banking but are to some extent set up to do the dirty work for non-Jews, to be the fall guy in case the system collapses, allowing non-Jews to retain credibility and continuity of rule. An example of this would be that Jews were historically hired by non-Jews as tax and rent collectors, leading to a 'shoot the messenger' mentality. This argument only goes so far though, and I believe radical Zionists do play a major and direct role in the power structure, and aren't merely acting as proxies for other groups, though I believe they are one of a few major power players, and not necessarily supreme over the others.
A major question in all this is whether the media (and the neocon/neolib Zionists who control an outsized portion of it) is a master, servant, or associate of the 'NWO' power structure. I describe the top of the system as the 'media-intel-banking complex,' but who, if anyone, among those three is in charge I can't say. I lean strongly towards the media as an associate, who when acting cohesively is one of a few mafias with a major seat at the table (if it is in fact a totally global or near-global conspiracy, let's take a stab at describing 'the table' as deriving from the following 'worlds:' Five Eyes intelligence/military-industrial complex, American bankers and corporate shareholders, Western European corporate banking and Royalty interests, Zionist Jewish media and banking interests, Saudi interests and oil kingdom allies, Japanese corporate and banking interests, and possibly a Russian/Eastern European/former Soviet and Chinese contingent if they are in fact insiders, with any African, Latin American groups lacking significant power comparatively). As far as who of those groups is the boss, even the banking system could not exist without the media's approval, but it could also be strongly argued that any insiders, in media and banking included, who don't play ball with the overwhelmingly Anglo intel/defense complex could be eliminated or otherwise 'neutralized.' Plus there has been intel's role in directing the media, including by infiltrating chief executive positions in several major news networks, e.g. Operation Mockingbird. The overarching point here is that any agenda I can think of that has been described as Jewish is also being furthered by Christian conspirators, and outside of the media sector, the majority of people behind these agendas are not Jewish but Christian. I believe many Jews with powerful positions in the news media and Hollywood are carrying out an evil and Satanic agenda meant to propagandize and degrade viewers, but not as Jews, rather as members of the 'Illuminati'/'NWO' or whatever group(s) it is that has this agenda, alongside the majority of 'members' of this group who are not Jews.
I do agree that an increasing number of radical neocon Zionists have taken over key US foreign policy positions and steered US foreign policy to the benefit of Israel for decades, and I did generally agree with TPS's 'Zionist 9/11 coup' video from a while ago. I also agree that it appears Mossad was one of the main if not the main perpetrator of 9/11, but certainly had the help of US intelligence or elements therein, probably CIA, and had aid in covering it up by many high-level officials in the US government the majority of whom were not Jewish, although a significant number were. There was also cover-up by airline industry higher-ups who I would guess are not mostly Jewish and historically have had links to the CIA. The reason I downplayed TPS's comment about foreign aid to Israel is that it is insignificant compared to overall war spending, most of which occurs in the Middle East and is mostly to the geopolitical benefit of Israel and/or Saudi Arabia, though it's mostly non-Jewish interests who are enriched by it. The extra 9/11-related war spending has been $9.2 trillion so far since the year 2000, where it would have been $6.2 trillion if it had kept pace with inflation. Aid to Israel is not included in that budget but adds up to about $80 billion since 2000, or less than 1% of the foreign policy-related spending (0.15% of overall federal spending). However, if you conclude that 9/11 was Mossad-CIA, then radical Zionists are responsible for much more spending, although little of that has gone to Israel itself or apparently Jewish interests (aside from banking interests who collect interest on war debt, though due to the nature of the banking system A) societal indebtedness is inevitable, so B) the public indebtedness would have occurred from domestic spending, or in the form of private debt, and would have been about as deleterious to the economy as a whole. I referred to the documentary Renaissance 2.0 that explains how this works and recommend everyone watch it.)
It should also go without saying that the vast majority of ordinary Jewish people have no relation whatsoever to the 'Illuminati'/'NWO' or anything sinister (I'm only pointing it out because of insane accusations by a very small minority in the 'conspiracy community' that all Jews are warned about certain impending disasters, etc.). Most are just living normal lives and working normal jobs. They're largely middle-income, and have no link to or benefit from the banking system. Israelis themselves are economically worse off than Americans and Western Europeans; the average wage is less than half that in the US. Many Jews in and outside Israel do not support Israel's continued encroachment against Palestinians and the concentration-camp-style policies in Gaza, or support Israel at all. Hasidic Jews universally protest against Israel's policies and most do not support the existence of the state itself and believe it is a threat to Jews and Judaism. Many Jews are involved in the truth movement, and many are anti-war libertarians. In my local Ron Paul meetup, which also got into 9/11 and anti-Fed meetups, people who appeared to be Jewish were clearly over-represented (let's throw out a figure of 15-20% or more of the group when they are only 2% of the population, and maybe 5-10% or so in my area). Claims of a wider conspiracy point to Mossad's Sayanim volunteers, who do extend the group's apparent reach and size. But I seriously doubt that these people make up more than a tiny percentage of Jewish people. It's been estimated at 20,000 in the US, which is 0.3% of Jewish Americans. There are probably secret and semi-secret religious societies in the Christian world, and I won't name names because I haven't really looked into it, who have ties to people in the largely non-Jewish Western intel world and might lend them assistance. How would they be different from Sayanim? In terms of religion, most American Jews are non-practicing, let alone adherents of a specific Judaic doctrine, and they intermarry with non-Jews more than any other faith does. Some will point to something like an epidemic of rabbis who molest children as proof that Judaism itself is inherently corrupt by extension. Are Catholics corrupt because of the recent rampant child sex abuse among priests? Of course not. Why should we have the double standard?
I also wanted to address the claim in the podcast that Jews were restricted in livelihoods in Europe during the Middle Ages and Renaissance period. This is true. Jews were allowed to own homes in cities but in most countries where they lived were not allowed to be farmers or purchase large land tracts, and were generally excluded from feudal landholding which was the domain of white Christians. (In many cities Jews were also limited to certain neighborhoods (hundreds of years before WWII), usually poor neighborhoods.) Jews thus tended to work in knowledge-based trades. This has led to a culture where portability of wealth and skills is highly valued, which is why you see a lot of Jewish doctors, lawyers, accountants, consultants, stockbrokers, etc. today. In the Middle Ages the majority of Jews were shopkeeps, street sellers, and other kinds of merchants, as well as mechanics/repairmen. Other less savory occupations worked by Jews were pawnbroker, lender, and slave trader, but these comprised a tiny percentage of Jews (<5% total). Education is considered an asset just as much as land, and as I understand there is mentality of landowning as being a trap or for suckers. The valuing of mobility very highly is similar to gypsy culture. I think both gypsies and Jews held and in some cases do still hold a deep derision for sedentary Europeans, and as I will get into in a future blog post, I think this animus for 'settled people' isn't entirely unfounded, one reason being that they can be exploited by and go along with governments as a means to keep their land plots, and tend to be hostile to, if not violent against, groups who wish to retain mobility and have a less absolutist perspective on land ownership rights. Focusing on banking, Christians were forbidden by religion to work as bankers (interest was banned by the church), money lenders, or money changers, which led to a Jewish takeover of the industry. Historical sources show that only a low single-digit percentage of Jews (1-2%) were involved in the industry.
Another thing is that I don't like the term Zionist, because most Zionists simply believe in the right of Jews to have a state in the Levant, and don't necessarily support the settlements or encroachment onto Palestinian land. Given that Judaism originated in Israeli territory, I don't have a problem with that. It was a mistake to try to undo the past and create the state and to kick Palestinians off their land, but it's too late to correct it now. Not every historical injustice or regret can or even should be corrected, and as far as I'm aware Jews weren't forcibly removed en masse from Israel at any point, but maybe I'm wrong about that. I don't see Irish or Scottish Celts demanding restoration of the Halstatt homeland they left behind. The best we can do in Israel at this point is to restore the old, originally agreed upon Palestinian borders and have two totally autonomous states. If Jews have a peaceful state in the Middle East, that isn't really going to be an issue for anyone, or it shouldn't be. However, Israel's violation of border agreements and genocide against Palestinians, with the clear goal of eventually exterminating them as a group, is wrong and should be stopped.
So again, we need a new term for this real group, like Zionist imperialist or radical Judeofascist (like the term 'radical Islamofascism'), etc., if any term is to be used, and use it exclusively to distinguish from people who believe all Jews are somehow in on it, and since the history of associating all or almost all Jews with that agenda is so long, I think it should be explicitly stated every time that it isn't referring to the overwhelming majority of Jews. Some adjective in the term needs to exclude A) Jews in general and B) the majority of Jews who believe Israel has the right to exist, but aren't 'Greater Israel' expansionists, don't support the situation in Gaza, and aren't tied to the power structure in any way. Even then, we have no religious descriptor for Christians involved in the power structure, so I don't see why we necessarily have to for Jewish members other than to point out they are involved in evil activities and let other people draw any conclusions about the role their religion may or may not play in it. The focus on religion also overlooks the big, rarely discussed problem with advocates of Zionism who are not Jewish religiously or ethnically (Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Biden, etc.) On that subject, I think it could be possible that Israel and radical Zionism itself were promoted, even designed by primarily-Christian Western powers as a means for staying involved in the Middle East, spending trillions on war, and suppressing liberties at home.
In short, I think describing it as a solely or even primarily Jewish conspiracy is a cop-out, specifically for white non-Jews, some of whom want to be free of all blame and don't want to face the disturbing reality that the enemy is in large part within, not on the outside, and want to turn what is in many ways a personal struggle on the individual level into a simple ethnic conflict. Anyone who is commenting on the role of radical Zionists should strongly emphasize their distinction from other Jews and communicate the other above nuances if they want credibility to outsiders, as well as to Jews involved in the truth movement. Otherwise Jews, like anyone else, will defend their brethren even if they disagree with them. And it's important not just to say 'some Jews are OK' and name one or two people, which is arguably implying that most are not OK and involved, legitimizing claims of anti-Semitism. It may be tiresome to do so every time it's discussed, but given how strong the stigma is and how sensitive the subject, I think it's necessary.
So is there some kind of real radical Zionist conspiracy, however cohesive, that is driving US intervention in the Middle East, draining billions a year in aid, villainizing Muslims via both the news media and Hollywood, endangering and killing Muslims in the Middle East, attacking anyone else who opposes its agenda, and using any ties it has in the banking system to its benefit? Undoubtedly. Does it consist of only Jews? No, and many, even most, behind it are non-Jews. Would there be some other bogeyman created if it wasn't the Islamic terrorist (as there were communists, anarchists before that, etc.)? In all likelihood, yes, and the West doesn't need the Israeli (or Saudi) deep state to manufacture a threat of Islam and Islamic terrorism, though the latter is ready and willing to help. Would our problems be solved if the radical Zionist power elite (for lack of a better term) were gone tomorrow? Absolutely not, and the core conspiracy and vast majority of (non-Jewish) conspirators would remain.
Personally, I think the evidence shows that 'The Network,' to use Joseph Plummer's term for the power structure, consists of members of all religions and is not oriented towards any major religion or theology in particular; if there is any shared 'spirituality', it might be an allegiance to and association with some kind of dark force. To whatever extent radical Zionists are acting cohesively and independently from the rest of the 'Illuminati' power structure, and I acknowledge there is some extent of independent collusion, they are only one of several players at the table, and even then do not have anything to do with the overwhelming majority of other Jews, which makes terms like 'Jew World Order' as bigoted and misleading as Christian World Order would be.
I think the best strategy on this issue is to acknowledge the facts when the subject comes up - the enormous Jewish over-representation among Federal Reserve heads and heads of news media sources, record companies, and Hollywood studios, the latter of which are all clearly in on the production of fake news 'tragedies' and propagandizing of the American people (it's not their religion alone that's an issue, it's that accompanied with their universal promotion for Middle East intervention, ridicule of 9/11 truthers, and villainization of Muslims); the commission of 9/11 at least partially by Mossad and the direction of US foreign policy by Israel-linked interests for decades, the role of Israeli companies like ICTS in many hoax events (as well as odd things like the Great Seal of the US having a Star of David at the top)- as they are very relevant to the current state of the world, but if you are going to do so to ALWAYS accompany it with a huge amount of qualification that while you believe there to be some kind of cohesive Zionist conspiracy that needs to be put out in the open and not made a taboo subject, you are not in any way referring to all Jews, most Jews, or anything more than a very small minority of Jews, and that you don't hold the others guilty for any of it. And also to ALWAYS point out that most of the power structure consists of white Christians (and if anyone disagrees with that, I'd like to hear the evidence). That way the conspirators/'Network' members who are Jewish will not be able to keep hiding behind the vast majority of generally non-guilty Jews and referring to pogroms and genocides, etc. each time they are called out. The best way in my opinion to achieve the goal of targeting these conspirators in the media and Hollywood is not to harp on the fact that they are Jewish, just to repeatedly call them out as being actively involved in the deceptions that are being carried out, and not just looking the other way. To point out that the media isn't just helping the government, that they are in every sense part of the real government, which isn't limited to the three branches. The credibility and objectivity of the media needs to be repeatedly and completely called into question so that they are exposed as propaganda outlets, not news and entertainment companies, and any power that is there, Zionist or Ilumminist in nature or otherwise, will be reduced.
Any disagreements or thoughts on the nature of this aspect of the power structure are welcome.
Last Edited By: psmith85 Sep 16 16 11:46 AM. Edited 23 times