Remove this ad

(Largely) dispelling the myth of Jewish control of the media

Rss     Subscribe     Share     Tweet    


0 Points

avatar

psmith85

Posts: 310 Member Since: 11/22/15

Lead

Sep 13 16 8:06 PM

Tags : :

This post isn't meant to say that there aren't many powerful Jews in the media, it's meant to dispel the myth of domination. There clearly are a number of powerful figures and in a considerable over-representation. That said, there's no evidence I've seen that any of them work together cohesively any more than the media and power structure as a whole does (e.g. I haven't seen coverage by Jewish-owned-or-run, highest-level news organizations that treats Jews, Israel, or related issues more favorably than does that of similar non-Jewish-owned-or-run organizations). After combing through the leadership and ownership of the major companies in every media sector, the highest percentage that Jews make up in any of them is 35%, among TV network, film studio, social media network, and academic publishing heads, with record labels not far behind at 33%. The average of all fields was 23%. Notably, no news agencies (i.e. AP and Reuters) and only 6% of newspapers have Jewish management. These media sources are today perhaps a greater driver of the news cycle than TV networks, as most Americans currently get their news from online newspapers and magazines, and AP/Reuters content. In general, print/online news dictates the narrative in real time, and TV responds to it after the fact. Another thing to remember with regards to TV is that all programming is funded by corporate advertisers who are in large majority non-Jewish-owned-and-run companies and who themselves deliver much of TV's propaganda effect. With regards to ownership and majority voting power, 10.3% of media companies overall are Jewish-owned or controlled.

The main thing I confirmed yet again from this research is that the (largely non-Jewish-controlled; see recent thread) banks and their mutual funds own nearly every major company in every major industry of significance in terms of power. Not the Federal Reserve, but the commercial and investment banks that own the Fed and are the primary creators of fiat money.

My intention here and in other related posts is to bring attention to the fact that the power structure is not Jewish in nature but for lack of a better term, Illuminist/Satanist in nature (or maybe that's the right term), where all Christians, Jews, and people of other religions who are involved in it in a sinister way share allegiance to the same power, whatever it is. All agendas that are called Jewish by some are also pursued and in the majority of cases designed and spearheaded by non-Jews in the power structure. People who claim it is all Jews make the truth movement look bad to outsiders because their claims are not based in evidence, and they lend some truth to ADL/SPLC claims of anti-Semitism. Kowtowing to the non-evidence-driven, Cointelpro-ridden it's-all-the-Jews choir is not going to get us anywhere. That's why I'm spending a lot of time on this, and also out of curiousity to see if any of the claims were true.

Just as there would be no tolerance for a racist member of an organization or company with 25% black membership, there is little tolerance for viewpoints perceived as anti-Jewish in companies with 25% Jewish membership. This doesn't translate into overall system domination in the sense of executive control, just a 'don't-go-there' attitude with regards to certain subjects. If someone working at a TV network or film studio questioned the official account of the Holocaust, there would obviously be strong backlash. If the same person were to dispute the official Boston 'Bombing' story instead, to use a random example, there probably wouldn't be more backlash than in any other powerful organization (i.e. still strong backlash). I think when you get the prohibition on certain 'Jewish' topics combined with the pro-establishment, anti-free-speech agenda pursued by every company in the power structure (both Jew- and-non-Jew-run), people conflate the 5% of specifically Jewish issues with the 95% that consists of pro-establishment 'Illuminati' agenda and relate both components to Jewishness. They thus assume that this phenomenon in other, apparently non-Jewish-run companies and institutions, lacking evidence of being caused by Jews, must be attributable to unknown, shadowy Jews within them, when 95% of the agenda was all along shared between Jewish and non-Jewish interests alike and being protected and pursued by both parties. That is the trap that many in the truth movement have fallen into when they see the over-representation of Jews in the media and then over-ascribe bad circumstances to it and dramatically under-ascribe (sometimes to the point of zero) the world's ills to the 'non-Jewish' parts of the power structure that make up the large bulk of it. Yet again, I'm acknowledging an over-representation, but it's still a small piece of the puzzle.

Note: When ownership is described as 'banks and funds' this usually means there are hundreds or thousands of funds and other institutional investors involved, with share per 'major shareholder' entity mentioned averaging 2-3% or less, although in some cases as high as 10%. The largest five of these owners are listed in order. Any stakes over 10% are noted.


TV Networks

Comcast / NBC
Parent Chairman and CEO: Brian Roberts (Jewish) (non-Jew according to PeaceGal's logic*)
CEO: Stephen Burke (non-Jew)
Chairman: Robert Greenblatt (non-Jew; Catholic; may be part Jewish)
Wholly owned by Comcast
Comcast is owned 84% by institutional shareholders: Vanguard, State Street, Capital World Investors, BlackRock, Wellington; Roberts has effective veto power due to Class B shares
NBC until recently owned by non-Jew-owned-and-run General Electric

Walt Disney Company / Disney-ABC Television Group
Parent CEO: Robert Iger (Jewish)
CEO: Ben Sherwood (Jewish) (previously non-Jew Anne Sweeney)
Owned by banks and insurance companies: Vanguard, State Street, State Farm, BlackRock, Fidelity, no major personal owners

Time Warner / Turner Broadcasting Systems / CNN
Parent Chairman and CEO: Jeff Bewkes (non-Jew)
CEO: Jeff Zucker (Jewish)
Owned by banks and funds: Vanguard Group, Massachusetts Financial Services, Dodge & Cox, State Street, JP Morgan

CBS / Viacom
President: Les Moonves (Jewish)
Chairman Emeritus: Sumner Redstone (Jewish)
CEO: Thomas Dooley (Viacom) (non-Jew)
Owned 80% by National Amusements (i.e. Redstone), other 20% banks and funds
Formerly owned by non-Jewish-owned-and-run Westinghouse

21st Century Fox / Fox News
Executive co-chairman: Rupert Murdoch (non-Jew)
Executive co-chairman: Lachlan Murdoch (non-Jew)
(former) CEO, founder: Roger Ailes (non-Jew)
Owned by Murdoch Family Trust

PBS
CEO: Paula Kerger (non-Jew)
Chairman: Afsaneh Beschloss (non-Jew; Iranian)
Owned by federal government via Corporation for Public Broadcasting

C-Span / National Cable Satellite Corp
Chairman: Brian Lamb (non-Jew)
CEO: Rob Kennedy (non-Jew)
Owned by National Cable Satellite Corp, no ownership data (private)

Univision
President & CEO: Randy Falco (non-Jew)
Chairman: Haim Saban (Jewish)
Owned by small group of banks and funds: Madison Dearborn Partners, Providence Equity Partners, Texas Pacific Group, Thomas H. Lee Partners, Saban Capital Group

Netflix
CEO: Reed Hastings (non-Jew)
Owned by T. Rowe Price, Vanguard, Harbor Capital, Fidelity, Hastings, others

Hulu
CEO: Mike Hopkins (non-Jew)
Owned by Disney-ABC, Fox, Comcast, and Time Warner

*According to Peace Gal and many in her camp, Brian Roberts is not Jewish but Catholic since he has a Catholic spouse, and that because he married a Catholic, 'the Catholics' now consider him 'one of them.' You see how ridiculous this is when you drop the double standard?


Film studios:

20th Century Fox
Chairman & CEO: Jim Gianopulos (non-Jew)
Wholly owned by 21st Century Fox

Warner Brothers Entertainment
Chairman & CEO: Kevin Tsujihara (non-Jew)
Vice-Chairman: Ed Romano (non-Jew)
Wholly owned by Time Warner

Universal Studios
CEO: Steve Burke (non-Jew)
Chairman: Donna Langley (non-Jew)
Co-Chairman: Jeff Shell (Jewish)
Wholly owned by Comcast

Paramount Motion Pictures Group
Chairman and CEO: Brad Grey (Jewish)
Vice-chairman: Rob Moore (non-Jew)
Wholly owned by Viacom (Redstone)

Sony Pictures Entertainment
Chairman and CEO: Michael Lynton (Jewish)
Owned by banks and funds via Sony Corporation, which is held in small stakes by US funds Moxley & Co. and State Street, bulk by Japanese and Chinese banks

Pixar Studios
President: Edwin Catmull (non-Jew)
CCO: John Lasseter (non-Jew)
Wholly owned by Walt Disney Company

Lionsgate Films
Parent CEO: Jon Feltheimer (Jewish)
Co-chairman: Patrick Wachsberger (non-Jew)
Co-chairman: Rob Friedman (Jewish)
Owned by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp
Bank and fund-owned: MHR Fund Mgmt, Smallcap World Fund, Liberty Global, Capital Research Global Investors, Vanguard


News agencies:

Associated Press
Chairman: Mary Junck (non-Jew)
CEO: Gary Pruitt (non-Jew)
AP is owned by its member papers

Thomson Reuters / Reuters
Chairman: David Thomson (non-Jew, British royalty)
CEO: James Smith (non-Jew)
Woodbridge Company (60% owner), controlled by Thomson family, non-Jewish CEO; not Rothschilds as is frequently claimed


Newspapers:

Gannett Company / USA Today
Chairman: John Jeffry Louis (non-Jew)
CEO: Bob Dickey (non-Jew)
Bank and institution-owned: Vanguard, Capital Research & Management Co., Newsouth Capital, BlackRock, CollegeAmerica

Dow Jones & Company / Wall Street Journal
CEO: William Lewis (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief: Gerard Baker (non-Jew)
Owned by News Corp (which is owned by Murdoch Family Trust, non-Jews)

New York Times
Chairman: Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. (half-Jewish, raised Episcopalian)
President & CEO: Mark Thompson (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief: Dean Baquet (non-Jew)
Owned 27% by Carlos Helu Slim (non-Jew) plus banks: Fairpointe Capital, BlackRock, Vanguard, JHL Capital

Tronc Inc. (formerly Tribune Company) / Los Angeles Times
Parent CEO: Justin Dearborn (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief & CEO: Davan Maharaj (non-Jew)
Bank and fund-owned: Oaktree Capital, HG Vora, Primecap Odyssey, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan

Washington Post
CEO: Fred Ryan (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief: Martin Baron (Jewish)
Owned by Jeff Bezos (non-Jew)

Tronc Inc. / Chicago Tribune
Parent CEO: Justin Dearborn (non-Jew)
CEO: Tony Hunter (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief: R. Bruce Dold (non-Jew)
Bank and fund-owned: Oaktree Capital, HG Vora, Primecap Odyssey, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan

McClatchy Company (owns 29 newspapers)
Chairman: Kevin McClatchy (non-Jew)
CEO: Patrick Talamantes (non-Jew)
Owned by banks and institutions: Royce Opportunity Investment, Vanguard, Dimensional Fund Advisors, Fidelity. McClatchy family has some voting power through Class B shares.

Philadelphia Inquirer
CEO: H.F. Lenfest (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief: Bill Marimow (non-Jew)
Owned by Philadelphia Media Network (a trust granted by Lenfest family)

Financial Times
CEO: John Ridding (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief: Lionel Barber (non-Jew)
Owned by Nikkei Shimbun Inc. and the Financial Times Limited (private)

Time Magazine / Time Inc. / Fortune
Parent Executive Chairman: Joseph A. Ripp (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief: Nancy Gibbs (non-Jew)
Owned by Time Inc., which is owned by banks and funds: Fairpointe Capital, Vanguard, JP Morgan, BlackRock, JANA Partners

IBT Media / Newsweek / International Business Times
CEO: Dev Pragad (non-Jew)
Editor-in-Chief: Jim Impoco (non-Jew)
Owned by Etienne Uzac and Johnathan Davis (non-Jews)

Hearst Corporation / Houston Chronicle / San Francisco Chronicle / Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Houston Chron CEO: John McKeon (non-Jew)
Houston Chron Editor-in-Chief: Nancy Barnes (non-Jew)
San Francisco Chron CEO: Jeffrey Johnson (non-Jew)
San Francisco Chron Editor-in-Chief: Audrey Cooper (non-Jew)
Parent chairman: William Randolph Hearst III (non-Jew)
Parent executive vice-chairman: Frank Bennack (non-Jew)
Parent CEO: Steven R. Swartz (mostly non-Jewish, German/Swedish surname: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swartz_(surname); no evidence is Jewish)
Owned by Hearst Corporation (100% owned by Hearst family, non-Jews). Hearst owns 31 TV stations (mostly local network affiliates, plus much of A&E and ESPN), 36 newspapers, and over 300 magazines (including Cosmo, Esquire, Elle, Oprah Magazine, Seventeen) and is the largest magazine publisher globally.


Social media networks:  

Facebook
Chairman & CEO: Mark Zuckerberg (Jewish)
COO: Sheryl Sandberg (Jewish)
Owned 20% by Zuckerberg, 15% by co-founders, 30% by employees, 35% by banks, venture capital firms, and angel investors. 

Instagram
CEO: Kevin Systrom (non-Jew)
CTO: Mike Krieger (non-Jew; Brazilian-German)
Subsidiary of Facebook Inc. 

Google / Youtube / Alphabet Inc.
Parent executive chairman: Eric Schmidt (non-Jew)
Parent CEO: Larry Page (half-Jewish)
Parent President: Sergey Brin (Jewish)
CEO: Sundar Pichai (non-Jew)
Sergey Brin & Page own 14% of Google Inc. and control 52% of voting power of Alphabet Inc. through supervoting stock. Remainder are institutional shareholders (i.e. banks, mutual and pension funds).

Twitter
Chairman: Omid Kordestani (non-Jew)
CEO: Jack Dorsey (non-Jew)
12% Evan Williams co-founder, 10% Suhail Rizvi, 5.2% Prince Alwaleed (Saudi), 5% Dorsey, 1.6% Dick Costolo, various venture capital firms

Linked In
Executive chairman: Reid Hoffman (non-Jew)
CEO: Jeff Weiner (Jewish)
Owned by banks and funds: Vanguard, Capital World Investors, Morgan Stanley, Sands Capital, BlackRock 

Tumblr / Yahoo Inc.
Parent Chairman: Maynard Webb (non-Jew)
Parent CEO: Marissa Mayer (non-Jew)
CEO: David Karp (Jewish)
Wholly owned by Yahoo Inc., which is owned by banks and funds: TCI Fund Management, Vanguard, State Street, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock 

Pinterest
CEO: Ben Silbermann (non-Jew; appears to be up to half-Jewish from father, other half Chinese; not that it matters, but married to Indian woman)
Owned by co-founders Silbermann, Evan Sharp, and Paul Sciarra via Cold Brew Labs Inc.

Reddit
CEO: Steve Huffman (non-Jew)
Chairman: Alexis Ohanian (non-Jew)
Largest shareholder (majority) is Advance Publications, which is owned by the Newhouse family (Jewish) and owns Conde Nast and a large variety of major magazines. Has minority shareholder groups of co-founders, angel investors, and employees. The Advance Publications control was highly publicized. For what it's worth, Reddit describes the relationship as of silent investor rather than parent company. 

While there's a large over-representation of Jews among social media executives, I think this is counter-balanced by the fact that all major social networks are essentially extensions of or minimally partners with the overwhelmingly non-Jewish US intelligence and surveillance complex, including the CIA, NSA, and FBI. In addition, most of the figures involved don't seem to have deep ties to their birth religion. Personally, I believe some of the major players in this space were hand-picked, groomed, and funded by Western intelligence in the early stages of their companies, if not from the beginning in some cases.


Advertising and Marketing Agencies

Omnicom Group
CEO: John Wren (non-Jew)
Chairman: Bruce Crawford (non-Jew)
Owned by banks and funds: MFS Investment Mgmt, Vanguard, Arnhold & Bleichroeder Advisors, State Street, First Eagle Global

WPP
Chairman: Philip Lader (non-Jew)
CEO: Martin Sorrell (Jewish)
Owned by banks and funds: Harding Loevner, Northern Trust, Invesco, Bank of America, Cambiar Investors

Interpublic Group
Chairman and CEO: Michael Roth (Jewish)
Owned by banks and funds: Vanguard, Fidelity, State Street, Harris Associates, BlackRock

Publicis Groupe North America
Parent CEO: Maurice Levy (Jewish)
Chairman and CEO: Susan Gianinno (non-Jew)
Owned by banks and funds: Capital Research and Management, Invesco Advisors, Fidelity, Vanguard, Burgundy Asset Mgmt

Dentsu / Dentsu Aegis Networks
Parent CEO: Tadashi Ishii (non-Jew)
CEO: Jerry Buhlmann (non-Jew)
Owned by banks and funds: Nomura Asset Mgmt, Harbor International, Fidelity, Nikko Asset Mgmt, Daiwa Asset Mgmt

These five companies are not advertising agencies but holding companies, and they collectively own hundreds of independent agencies who market themselves as independent companies, are actually hired by customers, and have full creative control over the design of the ads. Its comparable to GM and Chevy, Buick, etc., but significantly less involved. They do not exercise active control over their units and in most instances operate as shareholders. See here for more: http://adage.coverleaf.com/advertisingage/20150504?pg=72#pg72. The constituent units must be included for a more accurate representation of influential figures. The largest of these are:

J. Walter Thompson
CEO: Tamara Ingram (Jewish)
CCO: Matt Eastwood (non-Jew)

DDB Worldwide
CEO: Charles Brymer (non-Jew)
CCO: Amir Kassei (non-Jew)

Young & Rubicam
CEO: David Sable (Jewish)
CCO: Tony Granger (non-Jew)

Leo Burnett
CEO: Rich Stoddart (non-Jew)
Chairman: Tom Bernardin (non-Jew)

Starcom Mediavest
CEO: Laura Desmond (non-Jew)

FCB
CEO: Dana Maiman (Jewish)

TBWA
CEO: Troy Ruhanen (non-Jew)
Chairman: Jean-Marie Dru (non-Jew)

BBDO
Chairman & CEO: Andrew Robertson (non-Jew)

McCann Erickson
CEO: Mark Lund (quarter-Jewish; raised Christian)

Grey Group
Chairman and CEO: James Heekin III (non-Jew)


General publishers:

Penguin Random House
Parent CEO (Bertelsmann): Thomas Rabe (non-Jew)
Parent Chairman (Bertelsmann): Christoph Mohn (non-Jew)
CEO: Markus Dohle (non-Jew)
Chairman: John Makinson (non-Jew)
Owned 53% by Bertelsmann SE & Co. (German company) and 47% by Pearson PLC (British company, see below)

Thomson Reuters / Reuters
Chairman: David Thomson (non-Jew, British royalty)
CEO: James Smith (non-Jew)
Woodbridge Company (60% owner), controlled by Thomson family, non-Jewish CEO; not Rothschilds as is frequently claimed

HarperCollins
CEO: Brian Murray (non-Jew)
Owned by News Corp, which is owned by Murdoch Family Trust (non-Jews)

Simon & Schuster
CEO: Carolyn Reidy (Jewish)
Owned by CBS Corporation / National Amusements (Sumner Redstone)

Hachette Livre / Hachette Book Group
CEO: Michael Pietsch (non-Jew)
Owned by Hachette Livre (French company, private)

Axel Springer (large general publisher; largest owner German media: Bild, Die Welt; Business Insider)
CEO: Mathias Dopfner
Chairman: Giuseppe Vita
Majority-owned by Springer family (57%) (non-Jews; primarily Friede Springer), Dopfner 5%, General Atlantic 5%, rest banks and institutions


Scientific, medical, and academic publishers:

Holtzbrinck Publishing Group / Macmillan Publishers (large general and textbook publisher)
Parent CEO: Stefan von Holtzbrinck (non-Jew)
Parent chairman: Klaus-Dieter Lehmann (non-Jew)
CEO: John Sargent (non-Jew)
Owned by Stefan von Holtzbrinck and Monika Schoeller (non-Jews)

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (large textbook and educational software publisher)
CEO: Linda Zecher (Jewish)
Chairman: Lawrence Fish (Jewish)
Owned by banks and funds: Anchorage Capital Group, Fidelity, Vanguard, Glenhill Advisors, Bank of New York Mellon

McGraw Hill Education (large textbook publisher)
CEO: David Levin (Jewish)
Chairman: Larry Berg (Jewish)
Owned by Apollo Global Management (Jewish-owned and run)

Pearson PLC / Prentice Hall (large textbook publisher)
CEO: John Fallon (non-Jew)
Chairman: Sidney Taurel (Jewish; apparently no other Jews on board)
Owned by banks and funds: Schroder Investment Mgmt, Threadneedle Asset Mgmt, Lindsell Train, Libyan Investment Authority

RELX / Reed Elsevier (largest publisher of scientific journals and articles)
Parent chairman: Anthony Habgood (non-Jew)
Parent CEO: Erik Engstrom (non-Jew)
CEO: Ron Mobed (non-Jew)
Owned by banks and funds: Invesco Advisors, Managed Account Advisors, Lazard Asset Mgmt, Wells Fargo Advisors, Northern Trust Investments

Springer Nature (formerly Springer Publishing, one of largest publisher research and medical journals) / Science + Business Media (merged into former) / Macmillan Science and Nature (merged)
CEO: Derk Haank (non-Jew)
Owned by Holtzbrinck Publishing Group (German company, non-Jewish owned and run) and BC Partners (non-Jewish owned and run).

John Wiley & Sons (one of largest academic publishers)
CEO: Mark Allin (non-Jew)
Chairman: Matthew Kissner (Jewish)
Owned by banks and funds: Franklin Advisers Inc., Vanguard, State Street, Champlain Investment Partners, BlackRock

Taylor & Francis (large academic journal publisher)
Parent CEO: Stephen Carter, Baron Carter of Barnes (non-Jew)
CEO: Roger Horton (non-Jew)
Owned by Informa Ltd, major shareholders banks and funds: Lazard Asset Mgmt, Artemis Investment Mgmt, Fidelity, Norges, M&G Investment Mgmt


Record Labels:

Vivendi / Universal Music Group
Parent CEO: Arnaud de Puyfontaine (non-Jew)
Parent Chairman: Vincent Bollore (non-Jew)
Chairman & CEO: Lucian Grainge (Jewish)
Owned by banks and funds: Harbor International, Vanguard, Newton Investment Mgmt, Amundi, BlackRock

Interscope Geffen A&M
Chairman & CEO: John Janick (non-Jew)
Wholly owned by Universal Music Group / Vivendi

Def Jam Recordings
CEO: Steve Bartels (may be Jewish; not Jewish surname and no source exists)
Wholly owned by Universal Music Group / Vivendi

Sony Music Entertainment
Parent CEO: Kazuo Hirai (non-Jew)
Chairman: Edgar Berger (non-Jew)
CEO: Doug Morris (Jewish)
Wholly owned by Sony Corporation (for ownership see above)

Columbia Records
Chairman: Rob Stringer (non-Jew)
Executive vice president, general manager: Joel Klaiman (Jewish)
Wholly owned by Sony Music Entertainment / Sony Corporation

Warner Music Group
Chairman & CEO: Stephen Cooper (non-Jew)
Wholly owned by Warner Music Group / Time Warner

Atlantic Records
Chairman & CEO: Craig Kallman (non-Jew)
Wholly owned by Warner Music Group / Time Warner



Summary of 'Jewish' management or control of various media sectors:

TV News Networks
Managed: 7/20 of highest positions (35%)
Owned or controlled: 1/10 (1/5 of largest)

Film Studios
Managed: 5/14 (36%)
Owned or controlled: 0/7 (1/7 with significant voting control)

News Agencies
Managed: 0/2
Owned or controlled: 0/2

Newspapers and News Magazines
Managed: 2/31 (6%)
Owned or controlled: 0/12

Social Media Networks
Managed: 6/17 (35%)
Owned or controlled: 3/7

Advertising and Marketing Agencies
Managed: 6/25 (24%) )(Holding companies 3/9)
Owned or controlled: 0/5

General Publishers
Managed: 1/11 (9%)
Owned or controlled: 1/6

Academic Publishers
Managed: 6/17 (35%)
Owned or controlled: 1/8 (12.5%)

Record labels
Managed: 4/12 (33%)
Owned: 0/3

Media/Public Opinion Total
Managed: 37/149 (24.8%)
Owned or controlled: 6/59 (10.1%)

White Christian background: 104/149 (69.8%) (Estimated 78% Protestant/other, 22% Catholic)
Other: (one black American, two Japanese, two mixed race, two Middle Eastern, three Indian) 10/149 (6.7%)


Major figures in contemporary TV, Film, Radio, Music & Sports

Top directors (non-Jew unless noted): Martin Scorcese, Quentin Tarantino, Steven Spielberg (Jewish), Christopher Nolan, David Fincher, Ridley Scott, Peter Jackson, Paul Thomas Anderson, James Cameron, George Lucas, Oliver Stone. Non-Jewish 11/12.

Top 20 active actors (non-Jew unless noted): Johnny Depp, Leonardo DiCaprio, Tom Hanks, Brad Pitt, Robert Downey Jr. (half; raised Christian), Tom Cruise, Robert DeNiro, Will Smith, Denzel Washington, Al Pacino, Daniel Day-Lewis (half), Morgan Freeman, Jack Nicholson, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Christian Bale, Harrison Ford (quarter), Russell Crowe, George Clooney, Matthew McConaughey, Jake Gyllenhaal (half). All/mostly Jewish 0/20, half-Jewish 3/20, quarter-Jewish 1/20, non-Jewish 17/20.

Top 20 active actresses (non-Jew unless noted): Angelina Jolie, Julia Roberts, Scarlett Johansson (half), Jennifer Aniston, Jennifer Lawrence, Nicole Kidman, Charlize Theron, Meryl Streep, Sandra Bullock, Cate Blanchett, Kate Winslet, Emma Watson, Anne Hathaway, Cameron Diaz, Reese Witherspoon, Kiera Knightley, Gwyneth Paltrow, Natalie Portman (Jewish), Halle Berry, Jodie Foster. All/mostly Jewish 1/20, half-Jewish 1/20, non-Jewish 18/20.

Talk show hosts (non-Jew unless noted): Jimmy Fallon, Stephen Colbert, Conan O'Brien, Seth Meyers (non-Jew; <1/4 Jewish, raised and identifies as Christian), Jimmy Kimmel (non-Jew; Italian-German Catholic; formerly Kümmel), Craig Ferguson, Ellen DeGeneres, Kelly Ripa, Dr. Oz, Dr. Phil, Steve Harvey, Drew Carey, Oprah Winfrey, Meredith Vieira, Wendy Williams, George Stephanopoulos, Kathy Lee Gifford (quarter; raised and identifies as Christian), Barbara Walters (Jewish), Robin Roberts, Rachel Ray. Non-Jewish 19/20.

News presenters and hosts (non-Jew unless noted): David Muir, Diane Sawyer, Katie Couric, Brian Williams, Matt Lauer (half from father; not raised in any religion), Bill O'Reilly, Anderson Cooper, Shepard Smith, Rachel Maddow (quarter; raised devout Catholic), Megyn Kelly, Scott Pelley, Lawrence O'Donnell, Chris Cuomo, Chris Matthews, Charles Gibson, Al Roker, Wolf Blitzer (Jewish), Lester Holt, Keith Olbermann, Erin Burnett, Chris Wallace (Jewish). Non-Jewish 18/20.

Major radio and podcast personalities (that occasionally talk important issues) (non-Jewish unless noted): Howard Stern (Jewish), Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Mark Levin (Jewish), Sean Hannity, Michael Savage (Jewish), Don Imus, Thom Hartmann, Joe Rogan, Laura Ingraham, Adam Carolla, Alex Jones, Geoge Noory, Mancow Muller, Tom Ashbrook, Steve Inskeep. Non-Jewish 13/16.

Athlete mega-celebrities: Tom Brady, Tiger Woods, David Beckham, Derek Jeter, Mike Tyson, Cristiano Ronaldo, Lebron James, Usain Bolt, Peyton Manning, Michael Phelps, Manny Pacquiao, Kobe Bryant. Non-Jewish 12/12.

Top 20 music artists (certainly not in my estimation, just by top songs in charts) (mostly or all non-Jewish unless noted): The Chainsmokers, Twenty One Pilots, Major Lazer, Sia, Calvin Harris, Adele, Rihanna, Charlie Puth (half from mother), Drake, DJ Snake, Shawn Mendes, D.R.A.M., Ariana Grande, Justin Timberlake, Tory Lanez, Kiiara, Lil Wayne, Gnash, DJ Khaled. Non-Jewish 19/20.

Total of highest-profile celebrities: 11/120 (9.1%)

----

The following is cut-and-pasted from a forum I came across and studies the top 500 actors and actresses:

 ""
Top 250 actors split summary 

42 part or full Jews (<=12.5% not added), full-16 half-17 quarter-9; Three 12.5%, one 6.25% Jew
2 part or full Asian, full-1, part-1
11 part or full Black, full-9, part-2
3 non-White Latinos
1 part-Islander, 1 part-Maori
~190 fully non-Jewish European

=====================================

Top 250 actresses split summary 

33 part or full Jewish, full-12 half-17 quarter-4; Four 0% ethnic-Jew but themselves/parents converted
4 part or full Asian, full-1, part-3
8 part or full Black, full-3, part-5
9 non-White Latinas
4 White Latinas
~200 fully non-Jewish European

=====================================
All popular actors ethnicity here: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...try-background

​""

----


A final post on this subject is going to combine media, banking, and all the other major industries of the world to put an end to this notion for good. Yet again, this isn't to say that the strong pressure exerted by the Israeli lobby on US foreign policy, or the continuous bullying by groups like the ADL and SPLC aren't major and longstanding problems for the US. They are, but for calls against them to be effective they need to be separated from baseless notions of total Jewish domination, when all evidence demonstrates that that isn't the case.

Last Edited By: psmith85 Sep 19 16 6:51 PM. Edited 32 times

Quote    Reply   
Remove this ad
Remove this ad
avatar

Sleeping Apples

Posts: 38 Member Since:09/10/16

#1 [url]

Sep 14 16 1:54 PM

The amount of data is impressive to me, i even didnt know that some of this companys exist. If i understand correctly your thougt you care about the reputation of the "truth movement". For what i could see there is no "movement" there is no "WE", its me and you right now on the forum, maybe someone else another time, but in general every "WE the people" is controlled by some bad influencer.

I think its not all about Jewish, there is Jesuits, Catholic and more or less every big Religion involved in the media control.
Its a sort of big "mafia" where every group (religius, masonic, indipendent [rotary for ex] etc) push for gain more power but everyone fight the same big battle.

anyway jews at least deserve to be pointed out, they dresss differently from anyone, they marry only between them and they dont want you in their business at all.


I dont want to act like the flat earth ppl do but after i start reading some different version of the old testament, i can see that the scheme is pretty the same as the one described in the bible. Also the "satanic" influence is totally different of what we think it is (also different of what the main aternative info believe). Did you know why jews use circumcision?
If your interested we can discuss more about this.

Quote    Reply   
avatar

psmith85

Posts: 310 Member Since:11/22/15

#2 [url]

Sep 14 16 7:08 PM

Yeah, I'm interested in anything you have to say on any or all of the subjects you mentioned. As far as circumcision, I believe the reason is that it was thought to be 'unclean' to not be circumcised, which is the current medical justification for it. Not sure about the reasons in Judaism in particular. I've thought that in general (i.e. not just among Jews) the practice might have been done partially to deprive men of sexual pleasure as a means of keeping them and their temperaments 'in line' in their personal lives and perhaps on a societal level (e.g. less likelihood of personal and group flare-ups, or maybe it causes more of them due to repression, who knows).

I don't mean it's any kind of official movement. I don't like the term truth movement either. A more appropriate term in my opinion would be the anti-lie movement. All I mean by movement is the helping along of critical analysis of a variety of important issues, to the point where the truth about them becomes widely accepted, or at least the lies become rejected, not necessarily any kind of organization.

That really isn't true about Jews though. The majority (about 70%) don't wear yarmulkes or dress differently, and that's among people who identify as Jews and practice Judaism (not agnostics, converts to other religions, or people of part-Jewish heritage). And together as a group they actually marry outside the faith at a higher rate than any other identifiable religious or demographic group.

You're referring to ulra-Orthodox (Haredi) and Hasidic Jews, who make up a small percentage of Jews (13%), and who it should be noted generally don't support Zionism or believe Israel should exist as I understand, let alone are radical Zionists. None of the Jews in question in this field or any other part of the power structure, as far as I'm aware, are in that group.

That's actually a key point in the argument for why Jews should not be blamed as a group that I hadn't thought of before. If literally none of the thousands of high-level 'bad Jews' come from the segment of the population that follows Judaism much more strictly than the others, and who make up the 'purest' Jews in terms of Jewish ethnicity, then it would indicate there's nothing about the faith or ethnicity itself that is problematic, as some have claimed. That suggests the over-representation in certain fields is due to primarily to historical factors, lifestyle preferences, and simple nepotism and affinity one might have for people of a similar background, rather than anything more profound. Here is a link to give you an idea of their stance on the issue: http://www.nkusa.org/AboutUs/Zionism/opposition.cfm. Note: This viewpoint does not represent a fringe element in Haredi or Hasidic Judaism, it is their official stance on the issue of Zionism.

It also strengthens speculation that Zionism may be or originally have been a tool used by non-Jews to stay involved in the Middle East as a means to center the ('new') world order in the New World, on America, rather than on the center of the Old World aka Afro-Eurasia, which has been attempted so far by colonizing, destabilizing, and destroying the latter region. Isn't it odd that the apparent 'core' of Judaism are not Zionists, and the most ardent Zionists in terms of political and military will are by no means always but often Jews from 'outer layers' of the faith, and even non-Jews? If it's a project that's really so central to Judaism, why wasn't it taken up by the most observant members of the faith?

Last Edited By: psmith85 Sep 14 16 9:03 PM. Edited 14 times.

Quote    Reply   
avatar

Northbert

Posts: 46 Member Since:09/15/16

#3 [url]

Sep 15 16 4:33 AM

Hey Patrick!

it is my believe that the jews serve as some kind of scapegoat for the Illumined Ones since the age of Moses. Mostly, because they are the first monotheistic religion, and before the age of Judaism the pagans were celebrating their Higher and Lesser Mysteries.

The Lesser Mysteries were meant for the average Joe (who werent allowed to even talk about it), while the Higher Mysteries were reserved for the top hierarchy of the Priest class. The Higher Mysteries were also some sort of research institution for the top priest class, were it was known, that there is only one God. But for the normal people in the Lesser Mysteries the charade of multiple gods was kept up.

Then came this guy Moses about who was initiated into the Higher Mysteries in Egypt, and with this knowledge he built his own religion from scratch (aka Judaism) in order to give his ppl hope for the end of their slavery in Egypt.

So these dudes from the Lesser (the ppl) and Higher Mysteries (the Illumined Ones) were both pissed off, simply because Moses revealed their inner holy secret. And because of this hatred the Jews were used as scapegoat ever since.

Further proof for this theory are the so-called Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, which really are a forgery, but only insofar that they were purportedly written by Jews. When examined, the Protocols turn out to speak truth, but the lie is, that they are the real meeting minutes of a meeting of old Jews. See the following pdf for clarification:

http://mileswmathis.com/protocols.pdf

So in my opinion this is the reason for why the Jews are used as scapegoats by the Illuminati / Illumined Ones ever since. Cause they blew the lid on the secret that there is only one God. For more infos look up from Friedrich Schiller - Die Sendung Moses (The mission of moses):

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fgutenberg.spiegel.de%2Fbuch%2Fdie-sendung-moses-3319%2F1

All the best and keep up the excellent work!

Quote    Reply   
avatar

psmith85

Posts: 310 Member Since:11/22/15

#4 [url]

Sep 15 16 6:37 AM

So is your position that contemporary 'Illumined'/highest-level-insider Jews are fully aware of this but willing to play that role, not just for anything that happens in Israel but also for the abusive banking system (that they do not largely control, but the myth persists) and the propagandizing of the public by the media (that they mostly do not control either, and where they do have control and go 'off the reservation' could be easily unseated by the large money and power preponderance of insider non-Jews were that ever to be desired, which it hasn't been since they've all worked together)?

I read Moses and Monotheism early in college that illustrates the similarities between a late-Ancient Egyptian monotheistic religion (that Moses would have been acquainted with) and Judaism and Christianity, and links all Abrahamic monotheism to that Egyptian religion (which might have been a non-mainstream or heretical Egyptian religion, can't remember), and thought it made a pretty good case, but never really revisited the idea. It was fashionable at the time (and the unspoken opinion on the book of the professor, an outspoken atheist) to take the book as some kind of refutation of theism and cast religion and gods as ultimately constructs of men (sort of how Zeitgeist presents its whole section on religion), which I never pursued further since I didn't fully embrace that idea. It's worth noting that this idea is a foundational concept in Satanism (i.e. God as creation of man, not opposite). I'll look back into it as relates to Higher/Lower Mysteries. Do you speak German?

Last Edited By: psmith85 Sep 15 16 6:49 AM. Edited 3 times.

Quote    Reply   
avatar

Sleeping Apples

Posts: 38 Member Since:09/10/16

#5 [url]

Sep 15 16 7:01 AM

On "paper" i am christian catholic....in reality i am nothing.

In my opinion if we talk about jews or any other religion cult we must consider as part of them only who is really following the dictate of that religion.
There is muslims that are gay, so can we say muslim religion accept gay because a parte of them is gay? i dont think so.

There is catholic ppl here in Italy who doesnt go to church, doesnt even know how to pray (like me), if you see statistic released by the vatican i am on the list with the "real" catholic, but can i be considered catholic?

So lets take religions and groups for what their dictate are and not on how certain % of them act.

Before anything else about religion (based on the old testament) we must consider some interesting fact:

- there is a lot of books from the bible and every different religion group accept or refuse some of them, depends on what make them comfortable with their "theories". Take the book of Enoch for example, its accepted by some and refused from others (like catholic).

- the bible is originally written without vocals, for example the name Jehovah (catholic use just "GOD" to translate it) is originally written YHWH. After centuries the masoretes has putted the vocals on the old testament (and i stop here without looking at the translation made by the church in the millenia). So its obvious that they change the text on their favor.
Consider that if you change a vocal or his position it change all the meaning of that word.

- The bible is originally written in jewish (old) and in that language the word "GOD" doesnt exist

- Satàn is not described as a spiritual entity, is not a demon, is not the "EVIL", satàn is just a political figure, like a judge. If someone stole something from another and he get caught someone (not a particular person) will do the Satàn between the thief and the victim. I dont know if i explain myself, its hard to do that in english :)

- The word "GOD" is the (wrong) translation of the word ELOHIM that nobovy knows what this mean (there is many theories but nothing certain)

- The word Elohim is plural and not singular

Just by that you can understand why the vatican and the jews has different vision of religion even if all 2 religion are based on the same book.

The new testament is a hoax, in the beginning there was no original sin, there was no apple, there was no heaven.
The right translation of "heaven" (in old jewish is GAN-EDEN) is "Protected closed garden"
the apple of sin doesnt not exist, in the 300DC a pope (damaso if i remember correct) made a commission to translate the old testament in latin and put in the "malum" concept, MALUM also means and sound like "mela" (apple). This was the born of the apple in the bible, before the 300DC there was no apple at all. No sin, no apple, no new testament, jesus was send by god to absolve humanity from the original sin so if there is no sin there is no need for a savior.

In the old testament there is a figure called Elyon and another called Yahweh and Elyon was the one who divide the lands and peoples between the Elohims (elyon is also the one in genesis 1 who divide the upper waters from the lower waters)

Yahweh was just one of them, and if we look in detail he was the smaller one in fact he got the jews assigned. The jews was "enslaved" by the egyptin (there was no slavery but we can discuss this another time) so they wasnt even jews at the time, they became jews after leaving egypt.

YHWH was a jealous individual (Deuteronomy 5.6-21) why was he jealous? because there was many of em, and he said "you will have no other godS [elohims] other than me" this is where monotheism came from.

After this little introduction the most important thing to consider is that there was many Elohim at that time, for example there was Baalpeor and Baalzevuv and they was enemy of Yahweh
(Baalpeor became Belfagor - Baalzevuv became Belzebù) The church morph this other gods to evil and demons, the whole cult of "satan" is a bullshit of modern times.
There is a "evil" worship of a goat-god but it has nothing to do with Satàn

Every Elohim used to have a symbol to recognize their own ppl, and Yahweh has used circuncisum for this purpose. It sounds odd i know but this isnt even the most weird and "perverted" thing in the bible.

The real jews, who follow the dictate of the old testament, are a minority of the ppl in the world. If you see what they doin with palestina, its just what their religion imposes.
Jews has made a contract with YHWH and they still waiting for him to come back and respect the contract. Thats why they dont marry ppl from other religions. they are choosen by YHWH, only them and nobody else.

Conquer the territory, take only virgin young womens as your wife and kill everybody else, even childs. This is what YHWH want from them, so he can carve up the loot.


In conclusion jews are always seen like guilty ppl because they are from the beginning of time. Do they control media at all? fortunately not. They were small at the time and they are small now, but if you look at "how the world is ruled" you can clearly see a YHWH print.
Zionism is what YHWH promised to jews but unfortunately for them, he never kept his word and they still waiting, but according to their belief they will act as he said so.......

anyway there is not only the jews in the world to worry about..

More and precise infos on the topic (sorry for mistakes that surely i made) can be found in the books and conferences of an italian author, Mauro Biglino that has translated 17 books of the old testament for a publishing house of the vatican "San Paolo Edizioni".
If you know italian you can check him on youtube, or maybe subs work.

Last Edited By: Sleeping Apples Sep 15 16 7:05 AM. Edited 1 time.

Quote    Reply   
avatar

psmith85

Posts: 310 Member Since:11/22/15

#6 [url]

Sep 15 16 11:29 AM

You are right about the meaning of the word Satan. Etymologically, the words Satan (Hebrew: Satan: accuser) and devil/diavolo/diabolos (Greek/Latin) both mean 'prosecutor/accuser' and also 'slanderer/thrower' (potentially in terms of doling out punishment or reproach after a judgment), who has always been portrayed as a demigod as far as I know.

However, there's also the global ubiquity of the vengeful trickster figure (African and Native American religions, Old Norse religons, Christianity, etc.), who is more similar to modern conceptions of Satan but also has an accusatory nature in some faiths. Theologically there may be some figure in Abrahamic religions who we are not aware of due to a mistranslation or misunderstanding of the texts, who has always been of that trickster/deceiver nature but who is not the same as the 'old Satan,' or maybe they're the same. It's worth noting that in African and Native American religions, the trickster/deceiver was also the god of knowledge and often made 'gifts' of knowledge to mankind. Satanists/Illuminists worship worldly knowledge as an end in itself. While this may or may not be related, the letter G in Freemasonry is said to stand for Gnosis (Greek: knowledge), among other things. Whether that stands for worldly/material knowledge or spiritual/theological knowledge (as in Gnosticism), I don't know.

I'm trying to emphasize that your point about intermarriage just isn't true. Atheiest/agnostic/Reform Jews (who represent most Zionists) marry outside of and stray from the faith at a higher rate than any other religious group. Conservative Jews discourage interfaith marriage and also often support Zionism, but they only make up about 7% of practicing Jews, and again, very few if any of them (none that I am aware of) are found in the highest echelons of the power structure. People who most closely follow the Jewish faith (Haredim & Hasidim) do not support Zionism (mainly because it's impractical, dangerous geopolitically, and there were already people there), often refuse to vote in Israeli elections (though most don't live in Israel), and frequently protest against the state itself. They are apparently the most Jewish of all Jews in a religious sense, and certainly are in an ethnic sense. Yet they're not causing any problems on any level. So I don't think you're accounting for that.

Since Christians are Abrahamic people, I don't see how they're also not responsible for any contracts made in the Old Testament. Nothing I'm aware of in the New Testament nullifies pre-Christ covenants. There is also nothing in it I know of that disavows belief in YHWH as God. I don't see how adding vowels to YHWH changes much. It seems to just make it compatible with languages that have vowels.

As I would see it that would mean that Heaven, i.e. the Garden of Eden, was once on Earth, and that when sin was introduced, Earth became separate from Heaven/Eden. I can't find anything that ties Pope Damasus to the apple and original sin. It appears to have been formulated by Augustine in 345AD. While original sin is an important aspect of modern Christianity, I don't see how it crucially effects worship of what Christianity and Judaism believe to be the Creator, which I think is the most fundamental aspect of most world religions (that there is a higher, non-malevolent power that created the universe and mankind).

As far as the Deuteronomy verse goes, that's an accepted part of Christianity and it refers to the Commandments, which are also an accepted part of the religion. Study of religious texts and translations is such a huge and complex subject and I'm not really up on all of the ins and outs of it, but I plan on investigating these issues sometime (of Elohim, Yahweh, etc.)

It appears that both Jews and Christians have worshipped YHWH as God at certain points, but according to modern theology both groups currently worship God the Creator, whether or not he was also YHWH. This is the most crucial point: Orthodox Jews, (and all people who practice Judaism as far as I know) do not profess to worship or hold highest any god or being who is other than or separate from God the Creator of the universe.

Interested in your theory on how there was no slavery in Egypt whenever you have the time.

Last Edited By: psmith85 Sep 15 16 12:19 PM. Edited 5 times.

Quote    Reply   
Remove this ad
avatar

Sleeping Apples

Posts: 38 Member Since:09/10/16

#7 [url]

Sep 15 16 2:09 PM

About marriage im not saying what actually statistic on world jews do, im saying what is in the old testament.
I meant that by change the vocals of the words change the meaning, not that changing vocals on name change meaning.

About the 10 commandements its all wrong translated. Its not commandements for all the people in the world, is commandements for the ppl who live under Yahweh. For example you could kill and you must kill everybody else was not jew. Its not "dont kill" as catholic think.

Ask any christian if he think he has made a contract with god and then compare the answer that any rabbi would give you.

Nothing in the new testament nullify nothing, i said that new testament has no reason to exist cause there was no apple and no original sin.
The references that the vatican translator give are totally different from yours...i got DC date for many major editing and translation changes.

I invite you to check this guy "mauro biglino", you will get the full info not fractured like im doin, even for a matter of time and language barrier.

ah, the G letter stays for geometry, genesis, grade and many more...a lot of speculation on that....maybe it means garbage :)

Tomorrow il try to explain why i think there was no slavery for jews, its in the old testament by the way.

Night

Quote    Reply   
avatar

Northbert

Posts: 46 Member Since:09/15/16

#8 [url]

Sep 16 16 4:45 AM

psmith85 wrote:
So is your position that contemporary 'Illumined'/highest-level-insider Jews are fully aware of this but willing to play that role, not just for anything that happens in Israel but also for the abusive banking system (that they do not largely control, but the myth persists) and the propagandizing of the public by the media (that they mostly do not control either, and where they do have control and go 'off the reservation' could be easily unseated by the large money and power preponderance of insider non-Jews were that ever to be desired, which it hasn't been since they've all worked together)?
 

My position is that the contemporary "Illumined"/High-Level-Insider" Jews are only jewish on the outside. Its a charade they are playing for non-insider. In reality (aka when they are in private in their lodges) they practice their Illuminsm, which really is Luciferianism and has only little in common with Satanism, which was created as an intelligence front.

I think you are referring to pharao Akhenaten, who was the first Egyptian pharao to introduce montheism in Egypt. This monotheism wasnt very popular so the successor of Akhenaten reinstalled the old Egyptian faith after the death of Akhenaten. There is some speculation that this pharao Akhenaten was Moses himself, but I'm not really sure what to make of all this.

And yes, I speak German, how have you figured that out? :)

Quote    Reply   
avatar

Northbert

Posts: 46 Member Since:09/15/16

#9 [url]

Sep 16 16 5:34 AM

 

psmith85 wrote:
However, there's also the global ubiquity of the vengeful trickster figure (African and Native American religions, Old Norse religons, Christianity, etc.), who is more similar to modern conceptions of Satan but also has an accusatory nature in some faiths. Theologically there may be some figure in Abrahamic religions who we are not aware of due to a mistranslation or misunderstanding of the texts, who has always been of that trickster/deceiver nature but who is not the same as the 'old Satan,' or maybe they're the same. It's worth noting that in African and Native American religions, the trickster/deceiver was also the god of knowledge and often made 'gifts' of knowledge to mankind. Satanists/Illuminists worship worldly knowledge as an end in itself. While this may or may not be related, the letter G in Freemasonry is said to stand for Gnosis (Greek: knowledge), among other things. Whether that stands for worldly/material knowledge or spiritual/theological knowledge (as in Gnosticism), I don't know.

Yes, the G inside of the Freemasonic logo stands for "Gnosis" aka "Knowledge". Which really is what the Luciferians are worshipping. Prometheus brought the fire to mankind, which is a symbol for knowledge. The Luciferian version of the story of the Garden of Eden goes something like this:

"Man was held prisoner in the Garden of Eden by an unjust and vindictive God, and that man was not told by this unjust and vindictive God that he could have the same powers. And man was set free from the bonds of ignorance by Lucifer through his agent, Satan. And many believe that the two are the same, and that’s OK, because maybe they are. And that, through the gift of intellect, man, himself, will become God."

psmith85 wrote:
I'm trying to emphasize that your point about intermarriage just isn't true. Atheiest/agnostic/Reform Jews (who represent most Zionists) marry outside of and stray from the faith at a higher rate than any other religious group. Conservative Jews discourage interfaith marriage and also often support Zionism, but they only make up about 7% of practicing Jews, and again, very few if any of them (none that I am aware of) are found in the highest echelons of the power structure. People who most closely follow the Jewish faith (Haredim & Hasidim) do not support Zionism (mainly because it's impractical, dangerous geopolitically, and there were already people there), often refuse to vote in Israeli elections (though most don't live in Israel), and frequently protest against the state itself. They are apparently the most Jewish of all Jews in a religious sense, and certainly are in an ethnic sense. Yet they're not causing any problems on any level. So I don't think you're accounting for that.

 


image

psmith85 wrote:
Since Christians are Abrahamic people, I don't see how they're also not responsible for any contracts made in the Old Testament. Nothing I'm aware of in the New Testament nullifies pre-Christ covenants. There is also nothing in it I know of that disavows belief in YHWH as God. I don't see how adding vowels to YHWH changes much. It seems to just make it compatible with languages that have vowels.


It is indicated by a book entitled "Ancient Freemasonry: An Introduction to Masonic Archaeology" by Frank C. Higgins that the expression YHWH was a reference to some kind of "sacred trapezoid" which was holy to the ppl practicing the Higher Mysteries. See following link for more information about that theory:
https://viefag.wordpress.com/2013/05/10/mystery-babylon-ii-bill-cooper-02-archeology-of-freemasonry/

psmith85 wrote:
As I would see it that would mean that Heaven, i.e. the Garden of Eden, was once on Earth, and that when sin was introduced, Earth became separate from Heaven/Eden. I can't find anything that ties Pope Damasus to the apple and original sin. It appears to have been formulated by Augustine in 345AD. While original sin is an important aspect of modern Christianity, I don't see how it crucially effects worship of what Christianity and Judaism believe to be the Creator, which I think is the most fundamental aspect of most world religions (that there is a higher, non-malevolent power that created the universe and mankind).


Read "Modern Christianity" as "Roman Empire in disguise"
psmith85 wrote:
As far as the Deuteronomy verse goes, that's an accepted part of Christianity and it refers to the Commandments, which are also an accepted part of the religion. Study of religious texts and translations is such a huge and complex subject and I'm not really up on all of the ins and outs of it, but I plan on investigating these issues sometime (of Elohim, Yahweh, etc.)

 


Every accepted part of Christianity is "accepted", because the Roman Empire decided it is "accepted". 
 

Quote    Reply   
avatar

psmith85

Posts: 310 Member Since:11/22/15

#10 [url]

Sep 18 16 10:09 AM

I've seen that opinion, that the Commandments only apply to a Jew's actions as they relate to other Jews. But where is the evidence for that with regards to the Commandments in particular? If it's an assumption based on sections of the Talmud (which is not considered a divine text in any way, just a collection of discussions by rabbis from a certain time period) that say it's OK to wrong non-Jews, there are many verses in the Bible that call for Christians and Jews alike to kill non-Abrahamic people who worship other gods, or say those people are damned, or abominations, etc (same with Koran and Muslims). It's not unique to Judaism. Haha, yeah there were many other claims regarding the G, I just felt Gnosis was one of the most likely. I will check out Biglino.

Last Edited By: psmith85 Sep 18 16 10:49 AM. Edited 1 time.

Quote    Reply   
avatar

psmith85

Posts: 310 Member Since:11/22/15

#11 [url]

Sep 18 16 10:43 AM

I agree that they appear to be mostly just fronts for their real belief system and allegiance. It's obvious there's a unified 'faith'/association with a system that uses occult, Egyptian, 'Illuminati' symbology. I'm referring to Luciferianism /Illuminism /Satanism / 'Mystery Egyptian religion,' and to Lucifer and Satan as one and the same for simplicity's sake, and since I really don't know the nature of them and am not educated on the distinction between them. Anything that has to do with a demigod that is resentful of its non-God status and seeks to mislead and debase mankind (or futiley arrogate itself God status) fits the bill. I'm not referring to modern LeVeyan Satanism which I agree could certainly just be another CIA pop culture op.

I believe that is the pharaoh I was referring to, and remember it was just a short monotheistic phase and that the Egyptians quickly returned to polytheism, but that that brand of monotheism was said to have been the inspiration for Judaism.

Weird re: trapezoid. Will look into it. Reminds of 2001 Space Odyssey monolith. I shouldn't have used the word accepted without saying by whom. What I meant is that the majority of practicing Protestants/Catholics (from personal experience) do accept the biblical basis of the Ten Commandments in its entirety, without believing that the God that gave them to Moses is different than the God of the New Testament, 'jealous' adjective (which Christian Bible scholars would probably just consider to be something that was lost in translation) notwithstanding.

Thanks for the photo...a picture can be worth a thousand words. Figured you might because of the Spiegel article, and because while your English is 99.98%, I saw a couple slight idiosyncrasies that suggested you might speak another language primarily/alongside it (though thought they also might well have just been quirks of a native speaker, maybe from another region of US, or just someone who was typing quickly, etc).

Last Edited By: psmith85 Sep 18 16 10:47 AM. Edited 1 time.

Quote    Reply   
Remove this ad
Add Reply

Quick Reply

bbcode help